You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Niel D. Tupas Sr.’ tag.

By Francis Allan L. Angelo

THE photojournalist of The Daily Guardian is mulling criminal raps against the household of Iloilo Gov. Niel D. Tupas Sr. for detaining her and confiscating her personal belongings Friday afternoon.

Tara Yap said she was detained for more than 20 minutes inside the luxurious compound of Tupas in MV Hechanova, Jaro, Iloilo City.

Yap was on assignment to verify reports that another structure was being constructed inside the compound.

She was also instructed to take pictures of the mansion and new structure as part of the investigative report on lifestyles of public officials.

Yap took a taxi to the Tupas mansion bringing along her camera and personal items.

When they were some 150 feet away from the gate of the Tupas mansion, Yap said she did not notice any activity, thus she decided to leave.

She told the driver to go back and leave but a long-haired man dashed towards the taxi. The man knocked on the taxi’s window, opened the door on the right passenger’s side and ordered the driver not to leave.

Yap said she identified herself as member of The Daily Guardian by showing her ID card.

Then another man came over the taxi and ordered Yap to hand over her digital camera (Canon 350D) which she laid on the taxi seat.

The long-haired person who first accosted Yap then grabbed and searched her bag. Both men accused Yap of taking videos of the Tupas mansion.

Yap told the two men that she did not take any video or photograph and even showed the files in her camera to prove her point.

Yap said the long-haired man made a call in his cellphone and later gave his cellphone to Yap saying that Nielette “Tweety” Tupas-Balleza wanted to talk her.

Yap said Balleza, the only daughter of Gov. Tupas, accused her as the person who took videos and photographs of government-owned heavy equipment seen working in the governor’s house in Banate town.

But Yap repeatedly denied Balleza’s accusation.

After her conversation with Balleza, the long-haired man seized Yap’s two cellphones, Blackberry 8700 and Nokia 3310, and told her to go inside the governor’s mansion.

Yap stayed inside the compound where she noticed several men working on a new structure right beside the Tupas mansion.

Yap was later released after talking to Atty. Joenar Pueblo of the Provincial Legal office over the cell phone.

Yap said Pueblo acknowledged that her presence there was part of her work as a journalist.

“Atty. Pueblo told me to tell the men who accosted me that I was just doing my job as a media practitioner,” Yap said.

The two men later returned Yap’s belongings and released her from detention.

But she was later surprised when she learned that a certain Rey Balleza De Ramas, 33, a caretaker at the Tupas mansion, went to the Jaro PNP station and reported her presence at the mansion.

De Ramas alleged in the blotter report that Yap committed unjust vexation and violated Tupas’ privacy by taking pictures of the mansion sans their permission.

Yap said the incident caused in her fear, anxiety, prejudice, and violation of her human rights, reason why she is mulling criminal raps against Tupas and his caretaker.

As regards the Banate video and photographs, these were handed to The Daily Guardian by a source who took the said materials several months ago.

Yap went to Banate last month to verify the existence of Tupas’ house in Banate. She only took pictures of the finished house but these were never published.

Yap said her Canon digital camera can only take still photographs and has no capability to take videos.


The Tupas camp accused Yap of being a spy for another politician.

“I was illegally detained.  I did not commit any crime,” Yap said

Yap said she never resisted the orders of Tupas’ male caretakers. She said she could have been physically hurt if she resisted.

The Tupas camp alleged that Yap is a spy and in the payroll of 4th district Rep. Ferjenel Biron.

“I was never paid and I am not a spy.  Besides, a journalist cannot masquerade as a spy. I have an integrity to maintain,” she added.

Yap is also a correspondent of Manila Bulletin and international news wire service Agence France-Presse (AFP).

By Francis Allan L. Angelo

WHAT’S wrong with taking photographs of a public official’s property?

A legal luminary and former president of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines said Tara Yap, photojournalist of The Daily Guardian, did not violate any law when she went near  the mansion of Iloilo Gov. Niel D. Tupas Sr. in MV Hechanova, Jaro, Iloilo City.

Atty. Hans Sayno said Yap did not violate Tupas’ privacy as she was outside the governor’s multimillion peso mansion while working on an investigative report assignment.

The Daily Guardian assigned Yap to check reports that a new structure was being constructed beside Tupas’ mansion. The building is believed to be the house of Nielette “Tweety” Tupas-Balleza, the governor’s only daughter, who works as an executive assistant at the Office of the Governor.

Sayno said the Constitution guarantees the people’s right to information, particularly the conduct and lifestyle of public officials and employees such as Gov. Tupas and Tupas-Balleza.

Sayno said if Yap took pictures of the Tupas residence outside its gates, “I don’t think she violated the privacy of the household.”

“Taking pictures of a house is just like looking at the building. In the case of a camera, the image is registered in the memory chip of the instrument. There is nothing wrong if you take pictures of a house, especially that of a public official,” Sayno said over Aksyon Radyo-Iloilo.

Sayno said the extent of the right to privacy of a public official is less compared to a private individual.

“The penumbra of a public official’s right to privacy is lower than that of a private person. Public officials should expect public scrutiny of their lifestyle and conduct. In the case of Tara Yap, she is a media practitioner and the Constitution guarantees her right to expression and press freedom,” Sayno said.

Sayno said Yap could have intruded the governor’s privacy if she went inside parts of the house which are normally not considered public.

“If Ms. Yap went to the bathroom of Gov. Tupas’ house and took pictures of his toothbrush and how he brushes his teeth, there might have been invasion of property. But if she was situated outside the house, she did not intrude the privacy of the house,” he added.

Atty. Dennis Ventilacion, legal counsel of The Daily Guardian, said Yap was working as a journalist when she went to the vicinity of Tupas’ mansion.

Ventilacion said public officials are subject to scrutiny, particularly their lifestyle, and must allow the public to look into their wealth as mandated by Republic Act No. 6713 (Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees).

RA 6713 also mandates that “public officials and employees and their families shall lead modest lives appropriate to their positions and income. They shall not indulge in extravagant or ostentatious display of wealth in any form.”

Ventilacion said the acts of Tupas’ caretakers to grab Yap’s belongings and bring her inside the mansion against her will can be considered theft and illegal detention.

“If you restrain a person in a certain area against her will, that is illegal detention. If you grab her personal things without her permission, that is theft,” said Ventilacion who is a member of the IBP board of directors.

By Francis Allan L. Angelo

TWO district hospitals refused to accept two units of blood sample analyzers for reasons that the purchased equipments did not match the requirements in the purchase request.

The managements of the Federico Roman Tirador Sr. Memorial District Hospital (FRTMDH) and Ramon Tabiana Memorial District Hospital (RTMDH) said the hematology analyzers bought by the provincial capitol lack necessary components and are unreliable.

The two hematology analyzers were supplied by Crestline Scientific Corp. as part of the 2008 Health Facilities Enhancement Program (HFEP) which has a total funding of P33 million.

The HFEP is meant to upgrade hospital equipments in the province and is funded out of the Department of Health budget.

The hematology analyzers are used to examine blood samples.

Based on the purchase orders, each machine costs more or less P2.9 million.

The machines were delivered in September to FRTMDH and RTMDH but the chiefs of the two hospitals refused to accept the analyzers.

Drs. Noel Roy Gigare, FRTMDH head, and Levi Osea, RTMDH chief, sent letters to the Bids and Awards Committee headed by Atty. Salvador Cabaluna III why they cannot accept the machines.

The two hospital officials said the hematology analyzers delivered by Crestline lacked built-in mixers which were specified in the purchase request.

The mixers are necessary to provide correct proportion of blood and anticoagulant ratio, minimize destruction of the blood sample and eliminate manual agitation or mixing which might affect the result.

The delivered machines also lacked micro-cap inlets which was included in the purchase request.

Osea and Gigare said the micro-cap inlet is advantageous as it is convenient to use in blood samples of pediatric or child patients. There is no need to use anticoagulant tubes and syringes for specimen collection.

Also, small amount of blood is needed because it requires fingertip pricking aside from providing easy and fast results.

The machine also showed defects when tested by medical technologists of the two hospitals.

Gigare said in his letter that Crestline’s machines delivered unreliable and erroneous results.

Osea complained his letter that Crestline did not provide a procedure manual for the machine.

The machines also needed more calibration and require more time and longer orientation and supervision to perform various examinations.

Osea has reportedly resigned from his post but not because of the controversy but due to his application for a US immigrant visa.

June 2020

Blog Stats

  • 234,929 hits

Top Clicks

  • None

Flickr Photos